WPC%# A; &Vlp0/:!q_qxޟZRVKN〨jF\ԃ:1iFp<E@Z,,0,@9;]߼@%_6AU,YT?97L|㚴S ũ8=G <)yf"0IStf ^"Y+sz6i.swuײpٴ/TNsu{Vh {Pŗ0*SUd{ ϣV]aDv|; 0  0 0 0 0 0f 0? 0 0 0 0 0O 0 0 0 0 0s 0E 0 0 0 0o 0n2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 !!!!!!!!!!! 1U{"{"{" 1U"HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 60(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX($USUS.,(5hCEKQW]cioAutoList11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.굵* ):i+003|xU1.3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a) i)(;$25h  0  .3  0  2D+J 0_level2   ," <DL,23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  2A+J 0_level3   ) <DL)23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  2>+J 0_level4  ` &<<DL&23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  2;+J 0_level5   #DL#23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  28+J 0_level6    DL 23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  25+J 0_level7  h DDL23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  22+J 0_level8   L23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  2/+J 0_level9    L23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  2GJ 0_levsl1  X /%4 4 <DL/23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  2DJ 0_levsl2   ," <DL,23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  2AJ 0_levsl3   ) <DL)23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  2>J 0_levsl4  ` &<<DL&23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  2;J 0_levsl5   #DL#23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  28J 0_levsl6    DL 23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  25J 0_levsl7  h DDL23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  22J 0_levsl8   L23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  2/J 0_levsl9    L23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  2DJ 0_levnl2   ," <DL,23   2( 4 <DL2  <XX :Body Text In   X 5+4 44 <DL!5   5+ 4 <DL!5  2AJ 0_levnl3   ) <DL)23   2( 4 <DL2  2>J 0_levnl4  ` &<<DL&23   2( 4 <DL2  2;J 0_levnl5   #DL#23   2( 4 <DL2  28J 0_levnl6    DL 23   2( 4 <DL2  25J 0_levnl7  h DDL23   2( 4 <DL2  22J 0_levnl8   L23   2( 4 <DL2  2/J 0_levnl9    L23   2( 4 <DL2  <:Default ParaXXXXXX2M+M 0_level1  X 5+4 44 <DL!523  ..  5+ 4 <DL!5  2MM 0_levnl1  X 5+4 44 <DL!523   5+ 4 <DL!5  44444444(359=AEIMQ1 ========(359=AEIMQ2 !USUS.,  _@--#DRAFTADDENDUM  @; ;  TRACKING,TRIGGERINGANDAUDITSPAPER  @// TOADDRESS_CEMS_ԀISSUE  @$May21,2001 t @*AscurrentlycraftedtheWRAPinterimmilestonesarebasedonutilityemissionsdatafrom1999, 8  asmeasuredbyContinuousEmissionsMonitoringSystems(_CEMS_)andprojectedforward. $ t Parametersmeasuredbythe_CEMS_Ԁareperiodicallymeasuredagainstreferencemethodstoverify  ` accuracy.EPAhasestablishedseveralalternativeflowreferencemethodsthatarenowavailable  L  toutilities.Thesenewflowreferencemethodsareexpectedtoloweremissionreadingsfrom  8  thoseutilitiesthatswitchmethods.AscommittedtointheoriginalAnnex_submittal_,theWRAP $  hasdevelopedadraftprotocoltoaccountforchangestotheflowreferencemethodatutility   sourceswhendeterminingcompliancewiththeinterimmilestones.   Thefollowingsectionisrecommendedforadditionassubsection3attheendofthe Tracking,   TriggeringandAuditsPaper(May7,2001)inthesectiontitled ReconciliationandTrackingof p Changesand_submittal_ԀtoEPAaspartofthesupplementalpackage: \  (5h83 ! !0  3.Whenautilitysourcechangesitsflowreferencemethod,anadjustmentmaybeneeded 4 whendeterminingcompliancewiththe2003,2008and2013Milestones. p(#(# 0  Step1:CalculationofAdjustmentFactorH(#(# 0  Theadjustmentfactorforflowreferencemethodmaybedeterminedinoneofthreeways: (#(# 0  (a)Directlydeterminedthroughasidebysidecomparisonofdatacollectedwiththenew  andoldflowreferencemethodsduringaRATAtest.(#(# 0  (b)DeterminedthroughacomparisonofannualaverageheatrateusingAcidRainheat l inputdata(_MMBtu_)andtotalgeneration(_MWHrs_)asreportedtoEIA.Underthis X  approach,theflowadjustmentfactorwillbecalculatedasthefollowingratio:D!(#(# 0  0` (#(#HeatInput/MWforfirstfullyearofdatausingnewflowratemethod#l!` (#` (# 0  0` (#(#HeatInput/MWforlastfullyearofdatausingoldflowratemethod$X"` (#` (# 0  (c)DeterminedthroughacomparisonofthestandardCFMperMWbeforeandafterthe %0!$ newflowreferencemethodbasedon_CEMs_ԀdatasubmittedintheAcidRainProgram,as &"% follows:'#&(#(# 0  0` (#(#_SCF_/UnitofGenerationforfirstfullyearofdatausingnewflowratemethod)$(` (#` (# 0  0` (#(#_SCF_/UnitofGenerationforlastfullyearofdatausingoldflowratemethod|*%)` (#` (#   h+&* 0  Step2:ApplicationofAdjustmentFactor(#(# 0  TheWRAPhasidentifiedthefollowingthreeoptionsasacceptableforapplyingthe  adjustmentfactorforthepurposesoftheannualcompliancecheck,buthasnotyet t determinedwhichofthethreeoptionsisbest.Thethreeoptionsarelistedbelow.The ` WRAPwillcontinuetoworkwithEPAtorecommendapreferredoption.L (#(# 0  (a)Usingoneoftheoptionsdescribedabovefordeterminingtheflowadjustmentfactor, $ t revisethesourcesbaselineemissionsforecastfor2003,2008and2013.Foreachyear  ` followingtheadoptionofthenewflowreferencemethodthrough2017,reducethe  L  interimmilestonebythecorrespondingamount.Theannualcompliancecheckwillthen  8  bedonebycomparingregionalSO2emissions(unadjusted)totherevisedmilestone.An $  equivalentadjustmentwillalsobemadetothesourcesallocationundertheprogram.   Allocationsforothersourcesintheprogramwillnotbeaffected. (#(# 0  (b)Usingoneoftheoptionsdescribedabovefordeterminingtheflowadjustmentfactor,   revisethesourcesreportedemissionsonanannualbasis.Foreachyearfollowingthe p adoptionofthenewflowreferencemethodthrough2017,theannualcompliancecheck \ willbedonebycomparingtheadjustedregionalSO2emissionstotheunadjusted H milestones.Anequivalentadjustmentwillalsobemadetothesourcesallocationforthe 4 purposesoftradingundertheprogram.Allocationsforothersourcesintheprogramwill  p notbeaffected. \(#(# 0  Itisalsopossibletouseacombinationofthetwoapproaches,wherebytheinterim 4 milestonesareadjustedonlyeveryfiveyears((a)above)andthereportedemissionsfor   additionalsourcesmakingthechangeintheinterveningyearsareadjustedforcomparison   tothemilestones((b)above).