WPCN E4B3@Az/"-qcn: 0v:"; B; C< B< 0`<< 0`< 0`< 0`\= 0`= 08> 0T> B&? 02C? Bu? 0? 0:@ B*@ 0Y@ 0_KA 0 A D+B 0KB 0j*C 0D B5F AMF AF BBG D/G BGH 0YH D/I BZ J 0fJ 064K 0jK 0:rL 0^L 0< M BGFM BOMU6MU>NU*PNPNPN 0NzNzNzNzNzNU,N<6X9`(Courier  G'  _ 3[w3[WRAPIOCMeetingNotes{{L(#March25,2002  PhoenixMeeting~!~!T(#Page  1  #3[wM##13[.#  P AX) xdEPxA @ (2G$ !  3|d<6X9`(Courierd6X@`7@ 23rd 50th 90thTaliaferro($N* condensibles FLM VMT BEIS Nox EIFGaffneyLangston BACM EIIP P P NOxgridedairshedscondensible SOx CERRspeciated CMBnonattainment ASEMQA TOC IOCRaischLearyGrantham NTECCoefield"fragmentizationJolaine MTF meso NPS DOI&multi-stakeholder EI's F&W BFSactualsvsLaumannPechan3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)>$"Small Circle"0..(;3$2#  0  .3  0  EPSON Stylus COLOR 30000< 49Z+.Courier New Regular<9Z .Courier New Regular(5hCEKQW]cioAutoList11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Zy, U(EhCEKQW]cioAutoList21.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(UhCEKQW]cioAutoList31.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(ehCEKQW]cioAutoList41.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(uhCEKQW]cioAutoList51.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(hCEKQW]cioAutoList61.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. dLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 i)()*+,-.h}CEIMQUY]aAutoList722222222i)1)a)&/2(O;$0  2#  a  .3  0` (#(#(b$0  0` (#(#2#   .3  0 ` (#` (#(xir$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#2#(  0  )3  0 (# (#($0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#2#(  a  )3  0h(#(#(F$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#2#(   )3  0h(#h(#($0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#2#  0  )3  0(#(#({$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#0(#(#2#  a  )3  0p(#(#(F$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#0(#(#0p(#(#2#     )3  0p(#p(# ()*+,-.hCEIMQUY]aAutoList822222222i)1)a)0/2()*+,-.hCEIMQUY]aAutoList922222222i)1)a)2/2 Wpo I&mage <=8C HKKKK*+ (_2623  ..*G+M (_25   /%` ` hp x /23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *D+M (_24   ," hp x ,23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *A+M (_23  ` ) hp x )23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *>+M (_22   &hhp x &23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *;+M (_21   #p x #23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *8+M (_20  h  p x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *5+M (_19   pp x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *2+M (_18    x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  * (_1723  Ԁ*GM (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *DM (_15   ," hp x ,23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *AM (_14  ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *>M (_13   &hhp x &23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *;M (_12   #p x #23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *8M (_11  h  p x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *5M (_10   pp x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  (2M &_9    x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  ( &_823  (GM &_7   /%` ` hp x /23   5+ ` hp x 5  (DM &_6   ," hp x ,23   5+ ` hp x 5  (AM &_5  ` ) hp x )23   5+ ` hp x 5  (>M &_4   &hhp x &23   5+ ` hp x 5  (;M &_3   #p x #23   5+ ` hp x 5  (8M &_2  h  p x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  (5M &_1   pp x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  &2M $_    x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  0.Normal<:Definition T<AA:Definition L , 5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5(3$ !  &P d d86Definition(''&H1      ԀLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5P Pdd  d(&H2  (&H3  (&H4 XXX (&H5  (&H6  20Address8MM6Blockquote , , 5+ ` hp x 5   5+ ` hp x 5 d,*CITE d,dl*CODEK<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS42Emphasis&0 d d64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    4go2Keyboard K<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS 'dxd( $ Figure  1  <:Preformatted/%  ,Kk %#/K<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS/%  ,Kk %#/<:zBottom of 7w(X7  ?%2A`Arial?  S\  `&Times New RomanS7o(X71Large Dashed d[o&Draw Object <<=8C HKKKK Wpo&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK>Thick Double Pd Pdk)1dxdCTriple 1+| d d d<:zTop of For7z(X7  ?%2A`Arial?  S\  `&Times New RomanS7o(X7k)2dxdVQuadruple 18 d d d d0KS.SampleK<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS0.Strong 8dl6TypewriterK<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS42Variable: 8HTML MarkupB      2 0CommentB  CTriple 2+ d -d dKHeavy Triple+ d d d<6X9`(Courier New\  `&Times New Roman%2A`Arial(O$-zAZArial !  _1 <  X    @.MEMORANDUM  TO:  DanOlson,AirQualityAdministrator X FROM:  LeeGribovicz,RegionalImpacts/E.I.Coordinator  SUBJECT:  WRAPInitiativeOversightCommittee:PhoenixMeeting ( x DATE:  March25,2002    OnMarch2021,2002IattendedtheWRAPIOCmeetinginPhoenix,Arizona. H   AppendixIcontainsacopyoftheagendaforthisMarch2021stsession. `  @0Summary   TheIOCheardapresentationontheMobileSourceForumsproposalfor 0  defining significanceregardingMobileSourceTailpipeandRoadDust H  emissions.11TheMSFhasproposedadefinitionbasedonthe F ederal L and  Managers A QRVWork G roup(FLAG)report,witht#11#hebasictenantthatifa  sourcecategoryhasamajorimpactonvisibility(>10%),theneachindividual P elementwillbeexaminedinclosedetail(>0.4%=significant),butifthe h categoryitselfhasrelativelyminorimpactonvisibility(<10%),theneach 0 individualelementcanhaveagreatertolerance(>5%=significant).There  isnotyetcompleteconsensuswithintheMSFondefinition,andtheforumwill p meetApril15thtotrytoironoutthedifferences.Ifagreementisnot 8 reached,thequestionwillcomebacktotheIOCforfinaldetermination. P RegardingMultiPollutantLegislation,currentknowledgeoftheBush  AdministrationClearSkiesInitiative(CSI)wasreviewed,anditwasnoted X thatanysuchnationalutilitieslegislationhassignificantpotentialto  p affecttheWRAPRHmarkettradingprogram.TheEPAispromisingthatthey 8 willincorporatetheWRAPmilestonesintothefinalCSI,buttherearealot   ofquestionsregardingjusthowthiswillbeaccomplished.Therewasgeneral x! agreementthattheWRAPmustassurethatanytradingbetweenwestern&eastern @" utilitiesdoesntresultinalloftheemissionreductionsoccurringinthe  X# east.  $ UtahpresentedtheirconcernsregardingtheintegrityofWRAPAnnexpackage `"& undertheCSI,andpointedoutthattheWRAPtradingproposalincludesboth (#x' utilities&othernonutilitysources.Theyalsowantedtoinsurethatany #@( nationallegislationincludeswesternGCVTCnontransportregionstates(WA, $ ) MT,ND&SD),locksinexpectedwesternreductionofSO2,NOx&Hg,requires % * BACTonallnewunits,considersnewsourceimpactsonbothNAAQS&AQRVs, H&!+ providesincentivestoupgradeexistingsources,ensuresthat realemission '`", reductionsoccurinthewest,andprovidesforStateauthoritytoaddress '(#- localconcerns. (#. TheMTFpresentedstatusreportsontheissuesofAnnexStatus/Approval, 0*%0  GreaterReasonableProgressmodelingdemonstration,CriticalMass, *H&1 Allocations,RABART/ImpairmentAttribution,ModelRule/MOUfinalization, +'2 monitoringprotocolsandNOx&PM.TheForumhadjustheardapresentation ,'3 regardingCriticalMassanditwasconcludedthatingeneral,whena P-(4 state/tribepullsoutofthetradingprogram,theircostsgoupsignificantly. .h)5< Thusthereisalwaysabenefitforastatetoparticipatenomatterwhoelse  isincludedintheWRAPtradingprogram.  RegardingInterstateAgreements,DanOlsoninformedtheIOCthattheCAAmay  X requireCongressionalapprovalfordocumentssuchastheModelRule&MOU,in   ordertomaketheseagreementslegallyenforceable.Thisissuemustbe   reviewedfurthertodeterminethefullrepercussionsofthisprovision. i  TheIOCheardapresentationontheEconomicForumsWorkplantoprovideWRAP  @ forumswithsupportregardingeconomicanalyses.Therewasdebateasto   whetherthisEconomicSupportshouldbeprovidedbyaGeneralPurpose   Contractor(specificreport),orbysometypeofEmployeeContract(more Q  generalsupportcapability).TheWRAPwillissueanRFPandreviewproposals `  focusingonacontractorwith flexibilitytoimplementvariousplanning (  elementsoftheproject.   RegardingCleanAirCorridors,theCACWorkgroupnoteda1995reportfromBBC 9  Research&ConsultingreportthatexcludedSaltLake,easternIdaho&the H  WashingtonTriCitiesfromtheCACboundary.Therewastentativeagreement  thattheWRAPshouldacceptthisalternateBBCboundary,buttheCACWorkgroup  mustfirstevaluatewhatdifferenceinemissionsresultsfromthisrevision. Y ThePollutionPreventionForumgaveapresentationontheeconomicsand 0 impactsofRenewableEnergy/EnergyEfficiency(RE/EE)programsintheWRAP.  TheP2contractorsaremodelingtheseRE/EEoptions,withresultstobe y completedtheweekofMarch25th.Someconclusionswerethatthereare A barriersrenewableuseandfinancialincentivesareneededtosupportRE/EE.  P TheGCVTC10/20goalwillbemetwhengascostsreachapproximately$4.50/MCF,  andtheregionselectricityneedsarereducedabout8%whenmeetingthese  goals.Coalwillcontinuetobeamajorenergysourceintheimmediate a future.BecauseoftheexistenceoftheAnnexmilestonestherewillbe )p minimalSO2reductionsfromP2through2018,butNOxbenefitscanberealized, 8 alongwithsignificantemissionreductionsofCO2.    TheFireEmissionJointForumreportedonseveralinitiativesincluding: I"" AgriculturalAlternativestoburning,PrescribedFireAssessment,Enhanced #X# SmokeManagementPrograms,AnnualEmissionGoalsandEmissionReduction # $ Techniques. $% FinallytheWRAPWorkplandevelopmentandtimingwasdiscussed.TheWRAP 1&x' expectstoreceiveabout$4MMoftheEPAsbudgeted$10MMforthe2002grant, &@( buttheWRAPwontbeawardedthosefundsuntilaworkplanisfinalized,with ' ) spendingtooccurin2003.AschedulewaslaidoutforthePlanningTeam, ( * withreviewoflongtermplanstobemadeduringthesummer,andevaluationof Q)!+ adetailedoneyearplantobecompletedintheFall2002.Thecomplete *`", scheduledetailisincludedattheendofthismemo.  *(#- @,SessionDetails  @jj+HAnnouncementsH I  AndyGinsbergannouncedthathewillbesteppingdown,andRickSprottwill   takeovertheCoChairslotfortheIOC.Also,otherOregonleaderswillbe   vacatingpositions,withPatHanrahanwillsteppingdownastheCoChairof i  theModelingForum,andJohnKowalczykresigningtheMobileSourceForumCo 1 x ChairpositioninJuly.Andynotedthatthiswassimplyabudgetcutissue,  @ withOregonhavingshortfallsandcuttingbackattendanceatregional   meetings.HeemphasizedthatOregonwillcontinueparticipationintheWRAP   throughEMailandotherphoneconferences. Q  PatCumminsannouncedthattheWRAPhashiredTomMooreasthestaffTechnical (  Coordinator(beginningApril1st),andhasofferedthestaffPolicyPosition   toLeeAlderofNESCAUM.AlsohenotedthattheWRAPBoardMeetingwillbe q  pushedbackfromJune,andtheweekofJuly22ndwasselectedasasubstitute, 9  withthelocationstillinDenver. H  CoincidentwiththeBoardMeetingdelay,theTechnicalConferencehasbeen  pushedbackfromlateMay,andnowwillbeheldJuly910thinDenver.Oneof Y themajorWRAPconcernsisthe309DecisionProcess,andacriticalissuefor !h statesisthe BetterthanBARTdeterminationon otherClassIareas. 0 BecausethestatesdecisionsmustbecompletedinJunetoallowadequatetime  for309legislativeaction,thisrevisedJulydateistoolatetomeetthose y statesrequirements.The BetterthanBARTmodelingwillbecompletedby A thefirstofMay,andthereforetheMarketTradingForumwillsponsora  P  workshopMay2122ndtorollouttheresultsofthisAnnexmodelingforWRAP  review.  AlsoitwasannouncedthattheWGAwillhaveasecond EnlibraConference )p regardingenvironmentalpolicyofthewest,April2526thinSaltLakeCity. 8 @HHHSignificanceDetermination:MobileSourceTailpipe/RoadDustEmissionsH !! JohnKowalczyknotedthattheRHRrequiressignificancedeterminationsfor #X# MobileSourceTailpipeandforRoadDustemissions.IfMobileSource # $ Emissionsaresignificant,thenaMobileSourceBudgetmustbepreparedatthe $% lowestprojectedleveloftheplanningperiod(through2018).IfRoadDustis i%& significant,thencontrolstrategiesmustbeincludedintheSIP. 1&x' 11TheMobileSourceForumhasproposedadefinitionof significancethatused ' ) the F ederal L andManagers A QRVWork G roup(FLAG)reportasitsbasis#11*#.The ( * basictenantofthedefinitionisthatifthecategoryhasamajorimpacton Q)!+ visibility(>10%),thenwehavetolookateachindividualelementinclose *`", detail(>0.4%=significant),butifthecategoryitselfhasrelativelyminor *(#- impactonvisibility(<10%),theneachindividualelementisnotscrutinized +#. tothesameextent(>5%=significant).Moredetailofthespecificsofthe q,$/ significanceproposalformobilesourcetailpipe/roaddustemissionsare 9-%0 containedinaFebruary7,2002MSFdocument,withadditionalexplorationof .H&1 interpretationissuesdiscussedinaMarch8th,2002memo(IOCpageofthe  WRAPwebsite).  Theoriginalconceptwastotakeapercentageofhumanimpact(smaller  X number),butwearenowproposingtotakeapercentageofnaturalbackground   instead.Thisisalessstringentinterpretationbecausethehumanimpactis   likelytobelowerthanthenaturalbackground,thusthepercentagewould i  resultinahigherallowableabsoluteimpactnumber. 1 x JohnindicatedthattheWRAPmodelersfirstwoulddeterminethetotal   cumulativeimpactofthetwosourcesseparately(tailpipe&dust),tosee   whethertheeffectfromeitheremissionsourceontheWRAPregionwasgreater Q  orlessthanthe10%threshold.Thentheindividualsource elementswould `  beevaluatedtodeterminetheircontributioninaccordancewiththesecond (  tierstandard(0.4%or5%)dependingonthecumulativeimpactofthesource   category. q  Thereisaquestionregardinghowyoubreakdown elementsofthetwo H  categories.Thecurrentproposalisthatanentirestateistheelementfor  RoadDust,whilemajorurbanareaswouldbeoneelementofMobileSource  emissions,andthebalanceoftheruralareasofastaterepresentanother Y elementforMobileSources. !h Thusifthemodelersfindtheimpactofmobilesourcetailpipeemissionsis  >10%significantwhenremovingtheentirecategoryfromtheWRAPmodel,then y theimpactfromeachurbanarea(ie/Phoenix,Denver,SaltLake,LosAngeles, A etc.)wouldhavetobelessthan0.4%.Otherwise,theimpactfromeachurban  P areacouldbeupto5%withoutbeingconsideredsignificant.Regardingroad  dust,thesamecumulativetotalimpactwouldbedetermined,andifitshowed  >10%significant,theneachstateimpactwouldhavetobelessthan0.4% a impact.ForcumulativeWRAPregionroaddustimpactunder10%,thestate )p impactsignificancelevelwouldbesetatthe5%level. 8 Thereareproblemswithinterpretationofsomequestionssuchas:whether !! significanceisapplicableonlytotheoriginal16ColoradoPlateauClassI I"" Areas,andwhetherthesignificancecriteriashouldbeappliedtotheBase #X# year,aswellasthe2018FutureProjections.SomeMSFdebaterevolvesaround # $ theproblemofPSDCumulativeimpact,whereparticipantsdontbelievethis $% involvesotherstates,thereforeMobile/RoadDustcumulativeimpactshould i%& not.Alsosomebelieve0.4%istoostringentforRoadDust,considering 1&x' modelinguncertainties. &@( TheMSFwillhaveanApril15thmeetingtotrytoreachconsensus,andif ( * agreementisnotpossible,thequestionwillcomebacktotheIOCforfinal Q)!+ determination.MikeGeorgenotedthatthedecisionshouldberelayedtothe *`", modelersinJune,inordertostayonthescheduleofthemodelingworkplan. *(#- DanOlson,wantedtoassurethatthisisasignificancedefinitionsolelyfor q,$/ theRHR,anddoesnotimplythattheFLAGreportsomehowbecomessomesortof 9-%0 mandatoryrequirement. .H&1 ЇTheIOCfeltthatthegeneralapproachofseparatesignificancetestsfor  mobiletailpipeandroaddustwasacceptable.Regardingthequestionof  whetherthemobilesignificanceshouldbedeterminedinthepresent(1996)as I  wellasthefuture(2018),debaterscitedthefactthattheintentofthe  X GCVTCrecommendationwastoincorporateallplannedfuturecontrols(ie/Tier   2,dieselfuelsulfur,etc).Itisclearthatyouremorelikelybelikelyto   exceedthesignificancecriteriainthecurrentyear.ThisdatetheIOC i  reachedconsensusonaproposalthattheWRAPwoulddeterminesignificance 1 x bothinthecurrent&future.Ifsignificanceisshownin2018,youwould  @ havetoconstructamobilesourcebudget(forthoseareasthathavea   problem),butifimpactissignificantonlyinthecurrentyear,thenyou   wouldonlyhavetotrackmobilesourceemissionsforimprovement.The Q   currentyearwassetas2003,anditwasdecidedthat96emissionnumbers `  mustbeprojectedforwardtoobtainthisnewinventory. (  Therewasaquestionastowhetheran urbanareaisrepresentedbythe q  countyboundaryencompassingthecity,orwhethertheboundaryisbetter 9  definedasanonattainmentarea.Itwasdecidedthatthecountylineisthe H  mostappropriatecharacterizationoftheboundary.  Regardingroaddust,sinceVMTwillgrowwithoutthebenefitofsome Y  technologicalfixasoccurswithautomobiletailpipeemissions,itis !h suspectedthat2018roaddustemissionswillbehigherthancurrentlevels. 0 Thereforemodelrunswillbecompletedfor2018,only.Regardingthe  significancethresholds,thetestwouldbebasedonthecurrentdustemission y factors.Ifacumulative10%impactisdemonstrated,thenwewouldconduct A somerefinedanalysisthatwouldlikelyincorporateanimprovedmethodologyof  P calculatingemissionsandsomeprocedurefortargetingthespecificareas  wheretheproblemexists.  @ $HMultiPollutantLegislationH )p TheBushAdministrationClearSkiesInitiative(CSI)hassignificantpotential    toaffecttheWRAPRHmarkettradingprogram.TheEPA(LydiaWegman)is !! promisingthattheywillincorporatetheWRAPmilestonesintothefinalCSI, I"" buttherearealotofquestionsregardingjusthowthiswillbeaccomplished. #X# Therefore,theintentofthediscussionsthisdatewastodefinehowtheWRAP # $ willacttoorchestratetheincorporationoftheAnnexprogram,iftheCSI $% eventuallymovesforward. i%& PatCumminshadrequestedWRAPstakeholderstosubmitquestionsregardingthe &@( CSI,andthisdatetheproblemswerediscussed.RegardingSO2,thequestion ' ) ishowtoincorporatethetransportregionmilestonesintoanynational ( * tradingprogram.Thethoughtwasexpressedthatyoumustassurethatifthere Q)!+ istradingbetweenwestern&easternutilities,thatalloftheemission *`", reductionsdontoccurintheeast. *(#- Utahpresentedalistofconcerns(AppendixII)thatincludedthefollowing q,$/ elements: 9-%0  .H&1  ӄ0  integrityofthedentireAnnexpackagedmustbemaintained(includestribal  setaside,allocationmethodology,etc.,¬justwesternmilestones)(#(# Є0  noCSIdisincentivesforwesterndutilitiesdtodtradewithddnonutilitiesdI (#(# Є0  dincludedtheGCVTCdnontransportregionstatesdinthewest(WA,MT,ND&SD) X(#(# Є0  WesternregionalSO2,NOx&Hgcapsthatdlockindexpecteddreductionsd (#(# Є0  requiredBACTonallnewunitsd (#(# Є0  continuetodevaluatedmajordnewsourcesdimpactdforbothNAAQS&AQRVsdi (#(# Є0  incentivestodupgradeexistingsourcesd1 x(#(# Є0  ensurethatdrealtonsdaredreducedinthewestd @(#(# Є0  dretainStateauthoritydformorestringentplansdaddressinglocalconcernsd (#(# TheIOCtriedtoestablishsomeWRAPpoliciesforSO2including: Q  40  theAnnexisthenationalpolicyforthewest` (#(# 40  expandtheprogramtotheother11/13states(AK&NVout)( (#(# 40  anywesternstate/tribecanoptintotheAnnexw/oSIP (#(# RegardingNOx,theCSIproposesacapof538KTPYin2008forthe14states 9  inthewest(WRAP+NE&TX).ThiswouldreduceNOxabout28%fromthe H  currentlevelof750Ktons.Theproposalincludesnoeastwesttradingand  worksouttoabout0.28lb/MMBtuforcoal.TheIOCdoesnthaveaconsensus  onNOx,buttheWRAPneedstoretaintheabilitytoaddressBART. Y @)HMTFStatusReportH 0 TheMTFdeliveredstatusreportsontheissuesofAnnexStatus/Approval, y  GreaterReasonableProgressmodelingdemonstration,CriticalMass, A Allocations,RABART/ImpairmentAttribution,ModelRule/MOUfinalization,  P monitoringprotocolsandNOx&PM.DetailsarecontainedinmyMarch22,2002  notesfromtheMarch1819thMTFmeeting.  RegardingInterstateAgreements,DanOlsonnotedthattheCAAmayrequire )p CongressionalapprovalforproposeddocumentssuchastheModelRule&MOU,in 8 ordertomaketheagreementslegallyenforceable.Therewassomediscussion    astowhetheryourstatecouldtakeactionagainstanotherstatethatfailed !! toproperlyregulateasourcethataffectsyourvisibility,howeverno I"" conclusionswerereached.Thisissuemustbereviewedfurther. #X# RegardingCriticalMass,discussionfocusedonthefactthatparticipationis $% moreofa slidingscaleofbenefit,ratherthanan on/offswitchonthe i%& viabilityofamarkettradingprogram.Itappearsthatingeneral,whena 1&x' state/tribepullsoutofthetradingprogram,their ProductionExpenditure &@( costgoesupsignificantly.Thusitisalwaysabenefitforastateto ' ) participateinthisprogram. ( * @ $HEconomicAnalysisWorkplanH *`", FredRoachannouncedthatJeffBlendofMontanawilljointheEconomicsForum +#. withaPhDinEnvironmentalEconomics.TheforumhasaFebruary27th,2002 q,$/ draftStatementofWork(AppendixIII)forprovidingsupporteconomicanalysis 9-%0 totheWRAPforums.Theproposedtasks&activitiesinclude: .H&1 Ї0  establishingacommonframeworkforfutureWRAPeconomicanalyses(#(# Є0  identifyanalysiseconomicanalysisrequirementsfortheWRAP(#(# Є0  technicaleconomicproductreview(suchastheMTFCriticalMassreport)I (#(# Є0  producetailoredsummariesoftheeconomicfactorsforSIPs/TIPs(ie/  X health,recreational&intrinsicbenefits[qualityoflife,environment]&   costsofregulation) (#(# TheimplementationmethodforthisEconomicSupportcouldbehiredWGAstaff, 1 x butmoreprobablytheprojectwouldbeimplementedbyacontractretainerfor  @ expertservices.TheEconomicAnalysisbudgetis$190K.Wemightputsomeof   that($50K??)forretainer,andthebalanceforspecificcontracts.The   budgetappearstobesufficientforfulltimestaff,butPatCumminswas Q  skepticalabouthiringanotherstaffpersonontopofthetwopositions `  (technical&policy)WRAPjustfilled. (  ThedebateboileddowntoaconceptofaGeneralPurposeContractor(specific q  report)vs.sometypeofEmployeeContract(moregeneralsupportcapability). 9  TheconclusionwasthattheWRAPshouldissueanRFPtotrytofindasmaller H  contractorwith flexibilitytoimplementtheplanningelementofthe  project.  @>>(HCleanAirCorridorsH !h RickSprottdistributedaMarch14thdraftofapaperfortheCACWorkgroup  (AppendixIV).Thispaperisastartforevaluatingtheimpactsand y requirementsforCACs.Utahwantsthistobea commonsensepolicy A decision,andRickstillhastroublewiththeWasatchFront/SaltLakeCity  P urbanareabeingincludedasacleanairsource.  LeeGriboviczpointedoutthatalthoughwearefocusingonSaltLake,there a areotherurbanareasintheproposedCACsuchasBoise,Flagstaff,andthe )p WashingtonTriCities.Itwasalsopointedoutthatevensourcesoutsidethe 8 CACmustbemanagedsothatthereisnta significantimpactontheGrand    Canyoncleandays.PatCumminspointedoutthatemissionsaregoingdown,and !! therewasalotofdebatesuggestingthattheentireWRAPisthecleanair I"" sourcefortheGrandCanyon. #X# Therewasa1995reportfromBBCResearch&Consultingreportthatexcluded $% SaltLake,easternIdaho&theWashingtonTriCitiesfromtheGrandCanyon i%& CleanAirCorridor.AroughmapwasdraftedtocomparetheBBCboundaries 1&x' againstthoseproposedbytheTOC(attachedunderAppendixV).Thisdate &@( therewasatentativeagreementthattheWRAPshouldacceptthisalternateBBC ' ) boundary,buttheCACWorkgroupwillevaluatewhatthedifferenceinemissions ( * comestowhentheboundaryisrevisedfromthePitchfordmap.BrucePolkowsky Q)!+ willcoordinatewithJohnVimonttoassessthework. *`", @*HP2ForumReportH +#. JeffBurksgaveapresentationonthePollutionPreventionplanfortheWRAP. 9-%0 OutputsfromtheIPMmodelareusedasinputsforREMImodeltoassessthe .H&1 economicsofRenewableEnergy/EnergyEfficiency(RE/EE)programs.Their  contractors(Tellus&ICF)aremakingafinalrunoftheRE/EEimpacts,due  theweekofMarch25th(ICFisawarethattheseresultsmustbepromptly I  handedovertoPechanforproducingthe2018P2alternativeemission  X inventory).Theenergyefficiencyrecommendationsarebrokendowninto   residential,commercialandindustrialmeasuressuchasenergyefficient   lighting,appliances,andhighefficientmotors.Renewablesincludewind i  power,solarandbiomassalternatives.Theimpactofrecommendationsaffect 1 x energycosts,energysavings,emissionsreductions&economics.  @ Someconclusionsinclude:   Є0  therearebarriersexistingtorenewableuseQ (#(# Є0  financialincentivesareneededtosupportRE/EE` (#(# Є0  the10/20goalwillbemetundera highgas(appx.$4.50/MCF)scenario( (#(# Є0  theregionselectricityneedsarereducedabout8%inmeetingthegoals (#(# Є0  coalwillcontinuetobeamajorenergysourceintheimmediatefutureq (#(# Є0  therewillbeminimalSO2reductionsfromP2duetotheexistenceofthe 9  Annexmilestones(increasedRE/EEallowsdelayininstallationofother H  coalutilitiescontrols)(#(# Є0  NOxwillprovidethemostsignificantemissionoffset(#(# Є0  emissionreductionsofCO2isacollateralbenefitoftheP2programY(#(# @)HFireForumReportH 0 PeteLahmpresentedthereportontheFEJFactivities.RegardingAgricultural y Alternatives,theyhavea$142KcontractwithERGwithareportonthewebsite A andcommentsdueMarch25th.Theagriculturalcommunityinonlyafewstates,  P hasbeenreviewingthisproject,thereforePeteisinterestedingettingmore  helpincritiquingthework.  RegardingPrescribedFireAssessment,theyhavea$100KcontractwithEntranco )p (JohnCore),withareportdueinMay02.Thisprojectinvestigateshow 8 smokeandairqualityeffectsareaddressedinfireplanningandoperations.    RegardingEnhancedSmokeManagementPrograms,itisassumedthat309states I"" willrequireanESMP.PetenotedthattheRHRrequires astatewideinventory #X# andemissiontrackingsystemforfireemissions.Petenotedthatthestate # $ mustidentifyallanthropogenicsourcesofvisibilityimpairmentinitslong $% termstrategy,includingareasources;whichimpliesthatweneedaWRAP i%& emissioninventoryforallfiresources. 1&x' AccordingtotheTaskTeam,a309ESMPmustincludealloftheseelements: ' ) ̄actionstominimizeemissions Q)!+ Єevaluationofsmokedispersion *`", Єalternativestofire *(#- Єpublicnotificationprovisions +#. Єairqualitymonitoring q,$/ Єsurveillanceandenforcement 9-%0 Єprogramevaluation .H&1 ЇPetealsodescribedprojectsinvolvingAnnualEmissionGoalsandEmission  ReductionTechniques(ERTs).  @ H20032005WorkplanDevelopment/TimingH   PatCumminsnotedthatwehaveaFebruary26thdraftofEPAs RPOFourthYear i  Policy,Organizational&TechnicalGuidance.EPAhasbudgeted$10MMfornext 1 x yearandtheWRAPexpectstoreceiveabout$4MMofthattotal.Henotedthat  @ theEPAispreparedtoissuethe2002grantthismonth,buttheWRAPwontbe   awardedthosefundsuntilaworkplanisworkedout.TheWRAPwouldthenspend   those2002fundsin2003.ThereforePatindicatedthatitiscriticalforthe Q  WRAPworkplantobecompletedatleastbytheendoftheyear. `  Thecurrentschedulewaslaidout,andthescheduleforthePlanningTeamwas   developedasfollows: q  MTFMeetingforAnnexModeling(SaltLake).6May2122nd H  AirManagersCommitteeMeeting(SaltLake).||7May23rd  Ak) xdE0xA  IOCWebConferenceonP2Report.+June1st Y TOC/TechnicalCoChairsMeetingreviewthe5yrplan.@EarlyJune !h Ak) xdEO0xA 0 TOCTechnicalWorkshop(Denver).+July910th  IOCMeetingWorkplanReview/BoardMeetingPreparation(Denver).LLKJuly11th y Ak) xdE0xA A WRAPBoardMeeting(Denver).<<'July2223rd  P PlanningTeamMeeting(defineBudgetprioritiesfor1yrplan).JJuly24th  Ak) xdE0xA  WRAPBoardMeeting. NovDec a PlanningTeamMeeting(review3yearplan).6Jan03 )p TOC/TechCoChairsfinalize3yearplan.3Mar03  8   A <l   @66*APPENDIXI  @" " InitiativeOversightCommitteeMeetingAgenda   @z z #March2021,2002,2002@Phoenix `  @3  @<   @)APPENDIXII  @ !IOCMarch2021,2002PhoenixMeeting   @March18,2002DRAFT:UtahRecommendedPrinciplestotheCSI `  @3   @   @)APPENDIXIII  @ !IOCMarch2021,2002PhoenixMeeting   @` ` February27,2002DRAFT:EconomicForumScopeofWork  `   <l   @)APPENDIXIV  @ !IOCMarch2021,2002PhoenixMeeting   @March14,2002DRAFT:CleanAirCorridorWorkgroupEvaluationPaper ` <   @66*APPENDIXV  @ !IOCMarch2021,2002PhoenixMeeting   @` ` AlternativeBBCReportCleanAirCorridorBoundaryMap