Western Regional Air Partnership
Search the WRAP  
   
Printer Friendly Page
 
WRAP Home   About WRAP Contact WRAP
Board
Committees/Forums
SIP Status Summary
§308 Support
§309 Support
§309 Support
Tribal Resources
Other WRAP Projects
ClimateChangeOff
ClimateChangeOff
Fact Sheets
Kids's Corner
Contractor's Corner
Calendar
 
WRAP Sheet
Live Camera Pictures
National RPO Info
Getting Involved
Reimbursement
Related Links
 
WRAP Staff
The Western Governers' Association
The National Tribal Environmental Council
 
Technical Decision Systems
Contractor's Corner
Contractor's Corner
Contractor's Corner
Contractor's Corner
 
 

Air Pollution Prevention Forum: Meetings & Calls

Summary of the December 5-6, 2000 Meeting
of the WRAP AP2 Forum

Portland, OR


Venue

The WRAP Air Pollution Prevention (AP2) Forum met on December 5-6 in Portland, Oregon.

Attendees

Joining Forum Co-chair Jeff Burks (UT-DNR) at the meeting were Forum members Van Jamison (DOE); Ursula Kramer (PDEQ); Rich Ferguson (CEERT); John Nielsen (LAW Fund); Bob Green (Kennecott Energy); Julie Simpson (Nez Perce Tribe); Brian Hedman (Pacificorp); Amanda Ormond (AZ Energy Office); John Savage (OR Office of Energy); Rachel Shimshak (Renewable NW Project); and Cathy Ghandehari (DOE).

Also in attendance were Doug Larson and Dale DeCesare of the Western Interstate Energy Board who are providing technical support to the Forum. Speakers at the meeting included Stan Price (Northwest Energy Efficiency Council), Jeff Harris (Northwest Power Planning Council), and Mike Messeneger (California Energy Commission) who participated via speakerphone. David LaRoche (Northern Arizona University) also participated in discussions concerning the development of a tribal renewable resource paper.

Forum Actions

  • The Forum agreed to a revised outline for its energy efficiency report. The focus of the report will be on providing a recommended list of "best energy efficiency practices and programs."

  • With regard to Section IV of the Forum's efficiency report, the Forum agreed to produce a series of 2-3 page best practice summary papers: CLICK HERE FOR THE LIST OF SUMMARY ASSIGNMENTS. Assignments were made for Forum members Brian Hedman, Bob Green, Rich Ferguson, John Nielsen, John Savage, Cathy Ghandehari, Amanda Ormond, and for Co-chair Jeff Burks. The Forum also agreed to ask for the assistance of Stan Price, Jeff Harris and Mike Messenger in producing several of the 2-3 page summaries. The Forum agreed that the two page reports would be due by January 26, 2001.

  • Staff will draft Sections I, II, and III of the efficiency report for the Forum to review. Rich Ferguson agreed to review the draft. Staff will add some discussion in Section I regarding the regional and interconnected nature of the electricity system and emissions problems in the West.

  • The Forum created a Quantification Work Group to work on issues surrounding use of the ICF model to estimate the impacts of the Forum's energy efficiency and renewable energy recommendations. John Nielsen and Rich Ferguson will Co-chair the Work Group, which will consist of: Bob Green, Julie Simpson, Cathy Ghandehari, Dick Watson, and Rachel Shimshak. The Group will also contact Forum Co-chair Hap Boyd to secure the input of appropriate renewable energy developers for the Group's discussions with ICF. Priorities of the Work Group include:
    • Organize discussion between renewable developers and ICF on renewable assumptions in the ICF model (including the potential location and quantity of renewable generation projects to meet the 10/20 renewable goals);
    • Identify lesser levels of renewables that should be modeled;
    • Review important elements of the ICF model (e.g., treatment of transmission) ;
    • Review comments on the ICF model from Bob Green;
    • Determine efficiency and renewable inputs the AP2 Forum needs to generate for the ICF model;
    • Understand NWPPC work using the Aurora model and its potential use as a check against ICF model outputs;
    • Determine the utility of ICF outputs in developing state SIPs;
    • Determine linkage to tribal work on renewables.

  • The Forum established the week of February 12 as the target date for its next meeting. Potential meeting locations include: Phoenix and Las Vegas. Amanda Ormond agreed to check for meeting availability in the Tempe area.

  • Several assignments were made for additional follow-up information, including: determining if the Forum can tap expertise that went into the new 5-Lab Study; locating information on DOE metrics on efficiency measures (Cathy Ghandehari); locating information on emissions from gas-fired appliances such as furnaces and hot water heaters (staff); and identifying any ACEEE best practice recommendations through the ACEEE web site (staff).

  • The Forum reviewed a list of peer review comments of the final draft of its renewable energy recommendations. In general, the outside review of the report was very favorable. Click here for a full listing of the comments received: http://www.westgov.org/wieb/ap2forum/dec2000/rrcoment.htm. Based on the discussions at the meeting, staff will make changes to the renewables paper by next February's Forum meeting. Further refinements to the report will be made following modeling work to be conducted by a contractor to the Forum in 2001.

Items Discussed

The first day of the meeting was devoted specifically to the Forum's work towards development of energy efficiency recommendations to states under the Regional Haze Rule. After an overview of the WRAP, the Regional Haze Rule, and the Forum's energy efficiency Work Plan, the Forum reviewed and discussed the proposed outline for the Forum's energy efficiency report. The Forum agreed in general with the proposed outline.

The group discussed the potential to sort energy efficiency best practices by: 1) demand-side measures; and 2) supply-side measures. Within these categories, the best practices could further be organized by whether they target new versus retrofit efficiency opportunities. The Forum also discussed the possibility of creating a sortable "database" of the best practice write-ups. Also, a new Section V will be added to the report to provide more detailed information on how to implement the best practices proposed in Section IV.

Under Section IV, the Forum agreed to remove requirement #7 (regarding whether and how a best practice can be quantified in state implementation plans) from the 2-3 page best practice write ups. Instead, information is to be included on when energy savings from the proposed practice (e.g., seasonal benefits, etc...) will occur. Other information on the quantification of benefits could also be included under #3 (examples of implementation) if such information is available. Additional information on quantifying the benefits of best practices in the Forum report will be generated by a new Quantification Work Group which was formed at the meeting.

----------

Jeff Harris of the Northwest Power Planning Council recommended that, in Section I of the paper, there should be a discussion of how emission concerns at the state level are inter-related and that they affect emissions on a grid-wide basis. Harris also gave a presentation of his suggested list of "best practices" for energy efficiency.

Click here for his presentation: http://www.westgov.org/wieb/ap2forum/dec2000/harris.htm

Harris made numerous recommendations of best practices, including:

  • Building Codes - Harris said that the most successful examples of building codes to improve energy efficiency are found in CA and OR. He pointed to the fact that both of those states have an administrative process for involving private and public sector parties and have provisions for regular review of the code (every 3 years or so). Harris said the least effective program revisions are those done by legislative mandate.

  • Energy Tax Credits - The OR Office of Energy Business energy tax credit has been an effective program. Harris encouraged the Forum to look at the OR Office of Energy website for more information on this program, which worked as a partnership between the OR Office of Energy and the local utility (PG&E).

  • Utility Regulatory Policies - In the event that deregulation/restructuring does not occur, the Northwest has had good experience in achieving efficiency results by implementing regulatory policies.

  • Public Purpose Funding - If restructuring DOES go forward, however, then Harris recommended "Public Purpose Funding."

  • Market Transformation - Harris said utility program interventions can have large impacts on the natural buying and selling of goods in the marketplace.

  • High Performance Window Glazings - Products available to tune windows to varying climates. Building codes could be upgraded to take advantage of these technologies. Harris said that there is an opportunity in the West to use energy efficiency as a means of promoting economic development (for example, WA and OR each currently have one of only a very few glass-glazing plants). By promoting such technologies, Oregon is now a net-exporter of low emissivity-coated glass.

  • High Efficiency Appliances - Horizontal axis clothes washing machines are very effective. New federal standards will likely take advantage of these efficiencies, but do not guarantee efficient water use. Harris pointed out that every gallon of water that passes through a washing machine also must pass through water treatment plants and is heated as well. These processes each require the use of additional electricity. Harris stated that appliance trade-in programs can also be effective.

  • Efficient Lighting - Harris stated that the manufacturing capability in the U.S. for compact fluorescent bulbs is still too limited. Policies already require new commercial construction to use compact fluorescents, however an opportunity exists to begin to require compact flourescents in the residential sector as well.

  • High Efficiency Heating/Cooling Systems - Harris said DOE is currently developing standards for heating and cooling and that a western recommendation on such standards would be very timely. Harris recommended the potential for splitting standards based on the humidity of proposed applications (to account for important regional climate differences between the East and the West). Harris also recommended duct-sealing as a potential best practice. He suggested that a residential